<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lens Test: Tale of two pancakes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nangka.org/events/archives/1479/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nangka.org/events/archives/1479</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:15:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nona Yang</title>
		<link>http://nangka.org/events/archives/1479/comment-page-1#comment-770</link>
		<dc:creator>Nona Yang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 01:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nangka.org/events/?p=1479#comment-770</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an all purpose lens.  Nikon FM2n is a small and tough camera, the pancake is a small lens, the combo gives me a compact SLR to carry around for all unintended occasions. I am going to check out your photos now.  Thanks for your reply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an all purpose lens.  Nikon FM2n is a small and tough camera, the pancake is a small lens, the combo gives me a compact SLR to carry around for all unintended occasions. I am going to check out your photos now.  Thanks for your reply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://nangka.org/events/archives/1479/comment-page-1#comment-768</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 06:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nangka.org/events/?p=1479#comment-768</guid>
		<description>Hi. I don&#039;t recall either lenses having noticeable distortion, but what is obvious is that the Voigtlander seems to have better contrast than the 50mm f1.8 AIS. What are you planning to use the lens for? Would it be for architecture?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. I don&#8217;t recall either lenses having noticeable distortion, but what is obvious is that the Voigtlander seems to have better contrast than the 50mm f1.8 AIS. What are you planning to use the lens for? Would it be for architecture?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nona Yang</title>
		<link>http://nangka.org/events/archives/1479/comment-page-1#comment-767</link>
		<dc:creator>Nona Yang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 06:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nangka.org/events/?p=1479#comment-767</guid>
		<description>I searched all night for some reviews of Nikkor 50mm f1.8 pancake.  Finally gave up, bought one from eBay not knowing if it is any good, and now right before bed time I found your write up on the pancake.  No mentioning of photo images being distorted due to its short body (my concern) so I think the pancake will be okay with my Nikon FM2n.  Thanks for your information.  Your site is interesting, but it&#039;s late here, I will explore tomorrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I searched all night for some reviews of Nikkor 50mm f1.8 pancake.  Finally gave up, bought one from eBay not knowing if it is any good, and now right before bed time I found your write up on the pancake.  No mentioning of photo images being distorted due to its short body (my concern) so I think the pancake will be okay with my Nikon FM2n.  Thanks for your information.  Your site is interesting, but it&#8217;s late here, I will explore tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

